| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Vintage Girl Moderator

Joined: 05 Nov 2006 Posts: 3434 Location: Essex, England
|
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 1:13 pm Post subject: Be Prepared |
|
|
http://latestnews.virginmedia.com/news/health/2008/10/20/scout_leaders_can_hand_out_condoms
| Quote: | Scouts may be taken on trips to sexual health clinics after new guidance was issued to help young people Be Prepared.
The visits are suggested for explorer scouts aged 14 to 18 in the new advice issued by The Scouting Association.
Chief Scout Peter Duncan said: "We must be realistic and accept that around a third of young people are sexually active before 16 and many more start relationships at 16 and 17."
He added: "Scouting touches members of every community, religious and social group in the country so adults in Scouting have a duty to promote safe and responsible relationships and, as an organisation, we have the responsibility to provide sound advice about how to do that."
The new guidance says scout leaders can even give out condoms but "only if they believe the young person is very likely to begin or continue having intercourse with or without contraception". |
Is this simply a realistic approach or overstepping the boundaries? What are your thoughts? _________________ Girls are like phones. We love to be held and talked to, but if you press the wrong button you'll be disconnected! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JuanaLaLoca A-cute schizophrenic

Joined: 27 Dec 2006 Posts: 1291 Location: New England
|
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 4:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Well, if the Scouts really are touching "members of every community, religious and social group in the country", then I think it's a very good idea! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cherrybabe Inmate of the Asylum

Joined: 26 Jan 2007 Posts: 345
|
Posted: Sat Oct 25, 2008 7:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah me too Juana. No glove, no love.
If they must be sexually active at an early age and lets face it most boys are rampant at that age nowadays, at least let them take precautions and be sensible about it.
STI's are making an alarming comeback amongst young people. I would prefer them to spread the lurve not the clap, and not forgetting prevention of teen pregnancies also. _________________ -----------------------------------------------------------
I hear the ancient footsteps like the motion of the sea
Sometimes I turn, there's someone there, other times it's only me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wakeyboy Inmate of the Asylum

Joined: 08 Jan 2007 Posts: 615 Location: West Yorkshire, UK
|
Posted: Sun Oct 26, 2008 6:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It'd be nice if there was somewhere that WASNT ramming sex down kid's throats.
If they're getting sex ed at school, from the age of five then whats the point of going over it again during their leisure pursuits?
I feel that young people will feel even more pressured into have sex at a young age as they will feel its expected of them or that its normal. If adults are talking to them about contraception then they'll feel that they're of age to start having sexual intercourse. _________________ http://www.realradioyorkshire.co.uk/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Vintage Girl Moderator

Joined: 05 Nov 2006 Posts: 3434 Location: Essex, England
|
Posted: Sun Oct 26, 2008 11:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I absolutely agree Wakey.
I approve of sex education in schools, although I think at 5 years old it is much too soon, but I think that the Scouts is most definitely not the place for it. _________________ Girls are like phones. We love to be held and talked to, but if you press the wrong button you'll be disconnected! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kitchenwitch Inmate of the Asylum

Joined: 25 Mar 2008 Posts: 341 Location: Prison City
|
Posted: Mon Oct 27, 2008 12:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't see teaching kids about sexual health clinic in their scouting troop as "ramming sex down kids throats". I think they get that every time they turn on the TV or listen to music, and it isn't usually presented with information on STD's and contraception. Also, certain kids may take what their scoutmaster says more seriously than something they hear from their teachers. I think it's a good idea. _________________ In all matters of opinion, our adversaries are insane.
-Oscar Wilde |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
muppetmurderer A-cute schizophrenic

Joined: 14 Jun 2008 Posts: 1350 Location: South East (of the UK of course, Surrey in fact)
|
Posted: Fri Oct 31, 2008 11:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
I would hazard a guess that the boys (and girls) who are actually in Scouts would tend to be the more sensible (and dare I say, middle class) sector of the young population, who's parents are more likely to exert control and be supportive than most others. Its probably the ones who don't go to scouts are in most need of the advice and support being discussed here....
(and as for "ramming sex down kids throats", I thought that had become a thing of the past with the new rules in the appointment of Scoutleaders...)  _________________ .
.
Do you know what it means when you come home to a little affection, a little tenderness, and a little sympathy? It means you're in the wrong house |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wakeyboy Inmate of the Asylum

Joined: 08 Jan 2007 Posts: 615 Location: West Yorkshire, UK
|
Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 11:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think there should be tighter controls on content that is aimed at children, or accessible by children. There should be no glamorising of sexual promiscuity in anything that kids are likely to watch.
At an appropriate age, sex should be discussed in school and with parents at home.
It should not be discussed every flipping place the kid goes. Thats bombardment and is unhealthy IMO. _________________ http://www.realradioyorkshire.co.uk/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Merak Inmate of the Asylum
Joined: 05 Apr 2008 Posts: 214
|
Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 4:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
| muppetmurderer wrote: | I would hazard a guess that the boys (and girls) who are actually in Scouts would tend to be the more sensible (and dare I say, middle class) sector of the young population, who's parents are more likely to exert control and be supportive than most others.  |
I'd think you would be quite wrong in that assumption.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|